Wave Horizon 8
Wave Horizon 8 is a cushioned support shoe for larger runners who overpronate. Lighter than its predecessor, it combines an ENERZY NXT upper layer with ENERZY below. An asymmetrical Wave structure, enlarged medial rubber wall and broad outsole provide support. The stretch-woven upper helps hold the foot in position.
- Intended uses:
- Daily, Long run, Stability
Specs
Among 869 listed shoes, this is a heavier / high-stack Stability
- Weight
- 320g
- Of 814 known values: 753 lower, 12 equal, 49 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- heavierUpper 7.5%, including ties / average +53g
- Drop
- 8mm
- Of 818 known values: 410 lower, 239 equal, 169 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- Standard64.7th percentile (tie midpoint) / average +1.2mm
- Stack height (heel/forefoot)
- 41 / 33mm
- Of 694 known values: 613 lower, 21 equal, 60 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- higherUpper 11.7%, including ties / average +6.3mm
- Carbon plate
- No
- 83% of 787 known models have no carbon plates
- Midsole
- MIZUNO ENERZY NXT / MIZUNO ENERZY
- Outsole
- X10
- Reference price
- $170
- US price
Weight measurement and plate details
- Weight note
- The exact Mizuno Ireland page lists 320 g; sample size is not stated.
- Plate note
- No carbon plate is stated on the checked official pages. The official pages describe Foam Wave / Asymmetrical Mizuno Wave stability construction.
Compare within the database
See where these specs sit in the overall distribution. You can also compare within the same category.
Comparison: All data (869 shoes)
Position map
Weight x stack height
registered average: 266g / 34.7mm (686 shoes)
The scatter plot includes only shoes with both weight and stack height registered.
Spec distributions
Weight
This shoe 320g·registered average 267g (814 shoes)
Drop
This shoe 8mm·registered average 6.8mm (818 shoes)
Stack height
This shoe 41mm·registered average 34.7mm (694 shoes)
Items with missing numeric values are excluded. Sample sizes and measurement conditions vary between models; this distribution is not a performance ranking.