Carbon X 2
Carbon X 2 redesigns the original Carbon X for long-distance training and racing. Its PROFLY midsole pairs a responsive carbon-fiber plate with aggressive Meta-Rocker geometry to move from a cushioned landing into a propulsive toe-off. Lightweight engineered mesh, a gusseted tongue, and an integrated Achilles pull tab refine hold. A rubberized EVA outsole adds cushioning for training mileage and race-day efforts.
- Intended uses:
- Race
Specs
Among 869 listed shoes, this is a lighter / lower-stack Racing
- Weight
- 239g
- Of 814 known values: 180 lower, 4 equal, 630 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- lighterLower 22.6%, including ties / average -28g
- Drop
- 5mm
- Of 818 known values: 121 lower, 98 equal, 599 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- lowerLower 26.8%, including ties / average -1.8mm
- Stack height (heel/forefoot)
- 32 / 27mm
- Of 694 known values: 184 lower, 39 equal, 471 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- lowerLower 32.1%, including ties / average -2.7mm
- Carbon plate
- Yes
- 17% of 787 known models have carbon plates
- Midsole
- PROFLY X / CMEVA
- Outsole
- rubberized EVA
- Reference price
- $180
- US price
Weight measurement and plate details
- Weight note
- Men's 239g / 27cm from Deckers Japan official PR TIMES release; women's value is 198g / 24cm.
- Plate note
- Deckers Japan official PR describes a carbon plate embedded in the midsole.
Compare within the database
See where these specs sit in the overall distribution. You can also compare within the same category.
Comparison: All data (869 shoes)
Position map
Weight x stack height
registered average: 266g / 34.7mm (686 shoes)
The scatter plot includes only shoes with both weight and stack height registered.
Spec distributions
Weight
This shoe 239g·registered average 267g (814 shoes)
Drop
This shoe 5mm·registered average 6.8mm (818 shoes)
Stack height
This shoe 32mm·registered average 34.7mm (694 shoes)
Items with missing numeric values are excluded. Sample sizes and measurement conditions vary between models; this distribution is not a performance ranking.